The Charter Of Rights And Freedoms - 1363 Words

The phenomenon of entrenching the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not new to Canadian citizens, but it is a notion that is perceived in several ways. Many view it as a feature that disregards the fundamental right to democracy, an integral part of Canada’s political system. A functioning democracy is an important factor in providing citizens with the utmost rights and freedoms deserved. Society’s full potential is not being achieved if there are individuals who believe their principle of democracy is being violated. This violation nonetheless, true or not, should not be ignored. The fundamental belief that the entrenchment of our Charter violates the principle of democracy lies at the heart of the judiciary. Simply speaking, judicial†¦show more content†¦This leads to â€Å"inevitable bias being introduced into our political and legal cultures† (Dyzenhaus, Moreau, and Ripstein 544). Because these judges are coming from similar backgrounds, they share p erspectives that consequently lead to the suppression of those whose interests are not â€Å"adequately recognized or supported by the dominant, mainstream ideologies† (Dyzenhaus, Moreau, and Ripstein 544). It is not hard to understand why some fear a Charter that is so hard to change is violating the principles of democracy. Judges, in no sense, are in the position of moral authority nor are they experts in areas typically concerned with by the government (Dyzenhaus, Moreau, and Ripstein 543). The judiciary is the epitome of contrasting notions when it comes to self-governing, the heart of democracy. Allowing unelected judges to overrule decisions of legislators is problematic for all of society and represents the abandonment of self-government (Dyzenhaus, Moreau, and Ripstein 541). With self-governing and the principles of democracy comes the flexibility of interpretation. In a society where the people are essentially supposed to be in charge, interpretation should be, and is, required by those in power. But with a Charter so entrenched in a Constitution, the issue of the dead hand of the past arises. Society should not have to worry about the past influencing current decisions due to the abstract standard, which allows adaption to changing circumstances and

How The Civil War Became A War To Free The Slaves

When President Lincoln first called for troops to put down the confederate rebellion, he made no connection between this action and an attempt to end slavery. In fact, he explicitly stated the utmost care will be observed to avoid any devastation, any destruction of, or interference with, property... At this point, slavery was not yet integral to the struggle, it was much more important for the Union to air on the side of political prudence and avoid angering loyal boarder states. However, despite this lack of political dialogue, many abolitionists, slaves, and free blacks felt the war to preserve the union could also be a war to end slavery. In the end, they were right, as military need overwhelmed potential political dangers, slaves†¦show more content†¦Despite these misgivings, the Union policy of returning slaves who had not been employed by the Confederacy continued as the army moved through the boarder states. When they began to move deeper south, however, this polic y became much more difficult to enforce. General Ambrose E. Burnside found this to be true after invading coastal North Carolina and finding virtually no loyal slaveholders but many slaves who â€Å"seemed to be wild with excitement and delight.† This, combined with ever increasing recognition of fugitive slave labors importance to the Union war effort, led Congress to declare in March 1892 that Union soldiers were forbidden to return fugitive slaves to their owners. Even with this change in policy, the federal government continued to overrule emancipation efforts as they attempted to retain the loyalty of slaveholding boarder states. When General David Hunter proclaimed freedom for all slaves in South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida, he was quickly overruled by President Lincoln. However, while Lincoln clearly stuck down General Hunter’s proclamation, he also offered aid to the boarder states so they â€Å"may adopt a gradual abolishment of slavery.† Despite t his set back, Hunter continued to work for the emancipation of slaves, and went so far as to enlist ex-slaves as soldiers without any authorization to do so. Although his actions may have beenShow MoreRelatedThe Causes of the Civil War Essay example1121 Words   |  5 Pagesand turn on each other? The Civil war has main causes, key people, and battles. All of the people, events, and causes effected how the war came to be and how the Civil War was fought. The important people of the Civil war made important decisions that may have caused one side to a victory or a horrific lose. The battles of the war were bloody and devastating, and the causes of the Civil War show how different the North was from the South. Many people know the Civil War was extremely significant, butRead MoreEvents Leading up to the Civil War Essay1537 Words   |  7 Pagesdepression, farmers had their land taken away, shays rebellion came, and slavery became a topic of debate. This led to the constitutional con vention. Many plans were proposed, but only compromises were accepted. Two important compromises were the Great Compromise, and the three-fifths compromise. The Great Compromise made a two house legislature, and the three-fifths compromise made slaves count as three-fifths of a free person when counting population. During the convention they also agreed that congressRead MoreThe Events That Caused The Civil War1688 Words   |  7 Pages The Events That Caused the Civil War One could argue that the true causes of the Civil War were states’ rights and taxations. Although this played a large part in the start of the Civil War, slavery was the ultimate factor that led to this event in history. Economic and social differences between the north and the south, fights between slave and non-slave proponents, the growth of the abolition movement, and the election of Abraham Lincoln are all events having to do with slavery in the United StatesRead MoreWhat Caused The Civil War? Slavery? Politics?Social Conflicts?Maybe1628 Words   |  7 PagesWhat caused the Civil War? Slavery? Politics? Social Conflicts? Maybe it was little bit of everything. In 1861-1865 America s bloodiest conflict happened. It was called the Civil War. The Civil War was between the North and the South about slavery. The North was antislavery, but the South was all for slavery. The North wanted to free the slaves to help fight the war, but the South was not fond of that. Som e would believe that they would talk it out; however, they both decided to haveRead MoreThere Are Many People Who Argue What The Real Cause Or1651 Words   |  7 PagesThere are many people who argue what the real cause or causes of the civil war was. I believe there are many causes but the main cause would be the issue of the southern states not wanting to get rid of chattel slavery. The southern states were dependent on slavery for the production of their economics. The southern states would fight for their policies to over extend into the blossoming states rather than the northern polices. President Abraham Lincoln, without a single vote from the southernRead MoreTaking a Look at the American Civil War896 Words   |  4 PagesMany events during the mid-1700-1800s provoked the civil war because of the contradicting ideas between the northern states and the southern states. The conflict between the north and south that led to the civil war includes economic, social, and politic al events. At the meantime, slavery arose as a huge debate between the pro-slavery and anti-slavery faction. Fierce debates had sparked between the north and south states because of the southern states’ agrarian based economy. The geography in theRead MoreWas The Civil War Inevitable?1724 Words   |  7 Pages WAS THE CIVIL WAR INEVITABLE? Shannon Olivolo History 101: US History I 5 May 2017 The American Civil War was one of the bloodiest and deadly wars in US history, with over two percent of the population dying during war from either disease or injuries (Reilly 2016). One may question why this war was the most deadly in history and could it have been prevented. A vast majority of historians will argue that this war was inevitable due to many precipitating factors, mainly being theRead MoreThe American Civil War1296 Words   |  6 Pages The American Civil War, also known as the State’s War, was a conflict that arose mostly from the issue of slavery, but deep down was due to economic differences between the North and the South. The South seceded from the North and created their own self-government due to their belief in the lack of state’s rights versus the federal government and what they saw as a weakness in the Articles of Confederation. While the Confederacy of the United States depended on slave labor for their economy in regardsRead MoreSlavery Was A Part Of Many Societies And Nations Around The World1401 Words   |  6 Pagesthe practice until the Civil War in the mid-1800s. Before the Civil War, slavery and descendants of slaves were much of the backbone and strength of the society and economy of the United States. Slavery really fully developed during the colonial times; boomed in the South during the antebellum times; and finally dissipated after a war proved to be the only way to resolve the controversy. Slavery in the New World started in 1492 when Europeans started migrating, and slaves were brought from AfricaRead MoreFrederick Douglass : The Cause Of The American Civil War998 Words   |  4 PagesIn April 1861, the Un-united States of America went to war against each other leading to the death of 600,000 Americans. This tragic period is known as the American Civil War. Although slavery was an overarching issue in American politics, the cause of the Civil War was rooted in social, political and economic disagreements. One of the contributing factors which led to the Civil War were the social disputes between the North and the South. The morality of the issue of slavery was one which was

Facebook Addiction Free Essays

FACEBOOK ADDICTION SPEECH GOAL : I WOULD LIKE MY AUDIENCE TO UNDERSTAND THAT FACEBOOKING IS ADDICTIVE. INTRODUCTION : WHO DOESN’T HAVE ANY FACEBOOK ACCOUNT? MOST OF US ARE ON FACEBOOK BECAUSE EVERYBODY IS IN IT. RIGHT? TODAY, I WANT TO SHARE LITTLE THINGS ABOUT HOW THIS AFFECTS OUR DAILY LIFE. We will write a custom essay sample on Facebook Addiction or any similar topic only for you Order Now FACEBOOK ALLOWS US TO STAY CONNECTED WITH ONE ANOTHER, EXPRESS OURSELVES THROUGH PROFILE ACTIVITIES, INTERESTS, MUSIC, ETC. THIS ALSO ALLOWS US TO SEE OUR FRIENDS THAT WE HAVEN’T TALKED FOR A QUITE WHILE†¦ AND A GREAT ADVANTAGE FOR THOSE WHO ARE LIVING FAR AWAY FROM THEIR HOME TOWN WITH RELATIVES AND CLOSE FRIENDS. FACEBOOK HELPS US TO BUILD OUR SOCIAL LIFE SINCE WE COULD INTERACT WITH OUR MUTUAL FRIENDS WITH OTHERS AND MAY START A GOOD REALTIONSHIP WITH THEM. FACEBOOK GIVES US SO MUCH REASONS TO JOIN THE SITE, TO SIGN IN, AND NOT TO LOG OUT. IT HAS SO MANY FEATURES THAT A PERSON CAN DO IN ONE SITE SUCH AS PLAYING ONLINE GAMES ON FACEBOOK TOGETHER WITH YOUR FRIENDS AND RAISE YOUR FARM ON FARMVILLE. SPEAKING OF FARMVILLE, ONCE YOU’VE STARTED TO PLAY THAT GAME, YOU WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN YOUR FARM FOR YOUR ANIMALS AND IT WOULD GET INTENSE WHEN YOU START LOSING YOUR COINS AND SO ON. I MIGHT NOT HAVE PLAYED THE GAME BUT BASED ON MY INTERVIEW FROM A PERSON WHO ACTUALLY SPEND HIS WHOLE NIGHT ON FARMVILLE, THOSE WERE THE ONLY THINGS HE COULD SAY ABOUT FARMVILLE AS I ASKED HIM, HE WAS QUITE BUSY PLAYING IT. A LOT OF FUN APPLICATIONS YOU CAN USE ON FACEBOOK WHEN YOU GET BORED. BUT THESE COOL APPLICATIONS TAKES A PERSON’S VALUABLE TIME USING IT. ONCE YOU’VE START USING ANY APPLICATION ON FACEBOOK, YOU’D HAVE TO GET TIME TO MAINTAIN A CERTAIN LEVEL AND NOT TO LOSE YOUR POINTS. THESE TIME OF HOURS YOU’RE SPENDING ON ONE APPLICATION CAN ALREADY MAKE ONE SET OF DINNER ROLLS FOR SNACKS. AND NOT ONLY THAT, OF COURSE, AFTER PLAYING YOU’D GONNA CHECK YOUR NOTIFICATIONS AND NEWS FEEDS. THEN, YOU MIGHT ALSO LOOK AT YOUR FRIENDS NEW PHOTOS AND GIVE ATTENTION TO SOME NEW POSTS AND MOST LIKELY GIVE A COMMENT ON SOMEONE’S WALL. A QUESTION FOR EVERYBODY WHO’S ON FACEBOOK, DO YOU USE FACEBOOK FOR 5 MINUTES OR MORE THAN 20 MINUTES? BESIDES USING FACEBOOK ON YOUR PC, DO YOU ALSO OPEN IT ON YOUR SCHOOL’S LIBRARY OR YOUR CLASSMATES’ LAPTOP, OR EVEN ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICE MORE THAN ONCE PER DAY? IF YES, YOU ARE A FACEBOOK ADDICT. YOU WILL ALSO FIND YOURSELF LOOKING UP TO OTHER’S PROFILE, CHECKING ALL THEIR ACTIVITIES, MIND OTHER PEOPLE’S BUSSINESSES BETWEEN HOURS OF COMMITTED TO WORK. NOT ONLY THAT, YOU WOULD ALSO FEEL THAT LIFE WITHOUT FACEBOOK IS TOTALLY WORTHLESS. BASED ON MY OWN EXPERIENCE, I STARTED OUT SIMPLE ON FACEBOOK, KEEP IN TOUCH WITH MY FRIENDS, CHECK NOTIFICATIONS AND MESSAGES AND THEN LOG OUT AFTER 5 MINUTES. BUT NOW, IT’S ALREADY A MIRACLE IF I GET OFF AFTER 15 MINUTES. I GET INVOLVED IN MY FRIENDS’S LIVES THAT I ALMOST NEGLECT THINGS IN MY PERSONAL LIFE. ALL MY HOMEWORKS WERE PILED UP BECAUSE I GET LOST ON FACEBOOK. I tell myself that I am only going to get on for five minutes; however, as soon as I look at the New’s Feed, it’s all downhill from there. I SEE MY FRIENDS NEW UPLOADED PHOTO ALBUM AND I MUST SEE ALL THE PHOTOS INSIDE IT. NEXT THING I KNOW 5 MINUTES BECOMES 30 MINUTES TO AN HOUR. I become so interested with my friends’ activities that I don’t consider the time I spend on Facebook. I could be doing my homework or something more productive, but instead I am consumed with Facebook to the point where I wonder if it is an addiction. BEFORE IT REACHES TO A POINT WHERE IT WILL LEAVE US IN A COLD SWEAT WHEN WE’RE LOGIN OUT ON FACEBOOK, WE SHOULD Get off the computer WHEN WE GET BORED, INSTEAD GO FOR A WALK, HIT THE GYM OR SEE A MOVIE. THERE IS SO MUCH MORE TO DO IN LIFE THAN WATCH OUR HATCHING EGG GROW. REALLY! How to cite Facebook Addiction, Papers

Analyse the encomium on marriage showing Essay Example For Students

Analyse the encomium on marriage showing Essay Analyse the encomium on marriage showing how Chaucer reveals attitudes to marriage. How might a modern reader respond? An encomium is a formal expression of praise, a tribute. Chaucer makes use of this literary convention in his epic poem, The Merchants Tale. Through this encomium, which has been described by some critics to be one of the most amazing instances of sustained irony in all literature, Chaucer reveals various attitudes towards marriage, through his use of language, style and irony. The fact that Chaucer has chosen an encomium in which to reveal to the audience different attitudes towards marriage, in itself conveys the attitude revealed. The sermon style immediately calls into question whether or not the digression is to be taken literally or if it is in fact used by Chaucer to ironically reveal to the reader the Merchants true attitude towards marriage. The exaggerated language of praise supports this theory, as it can be seen as almost sardonic. The first issue concerned with, what critics know as the marriage encomium, does not involve the meaning of the sermon, but rather who it is speaking. It could be the Merchant who narrates the tale, or it could be the thoughts of the main character of the tale, Januarie, the elderly knight. However, one must recognise within the encomium, a complete disquisition of marriage, conveyed through Chaucers use of irony, which is most probably the point of view of the disenchanted Merchant. To begin with, the Merchant expresses the benefits of having a wife and dismisses the cynical view of women as wives. He cites the taking of a wife as being a glorious thing, especially when a man is oold and hoor. This is immediately seen to be ironic, to both a modern and medieval audience, as the Merchant has already explicitly expressed his belief that marriage only brings weeping and wailing. To name his own wife a shrew and then go on to call marriage a glorious thing is rather humorous, allowing the audience to enjoy and be aware of the insincerity of the Merchant. Chaucer uses irony effectively here, to convey the Merchants true attitude towards marriage. It can be seen that Chaucer expresses and reveals the Merchants attitude towards marriage through his language throughout the encomium. The highly rhetorical and exaggerated style of speech suggests the insincerity of the Merchant. This is seen effectively when the Merchant praises marriage: O bisful ordre of wedlock precious, Thou art so murye, and eek so virtuous, (L135-136) The language used here is almost hyperbolic, and to clearly convey the insincerity of the Merchant, Chaucer uses a rhetorical device called an apostrophe, where the narrator addresses an object. This is the tone and style of a sermon, highly suitable for the Merchants exaggerated language. Through this technique, Chaucer is able to express the Merchants real view of marriage. Chaucers use of language also conveys to the audience the Merchants attitude towards women within marriage. The Merchant uses the language of Merchants and refers to wives as being made for a husband, much as Eve was Adam. Women are created for mans comfort. (L112) This belief that a womans sole purpose is to accommodate men, coupled with the Merchants long list of different types of property reveals clearly to the audience where the Merchants values lie. It is here that Chaucer reveals the Merchants attitude towards women within marriage to the audience. Like Januarie, it is clear that the Merchant regards women merely as a possession; it is therefore apt that Chaucer has Januarie searching for a wife in the market place. .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 , .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 .postImageUrl , .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 , .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1:hover , .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1:visited , .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1:active { border:0!important; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1:active , .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1 .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ub2b82691794226475ec24daaa7b3b6c1:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Frost and Taylor EssayAfter this clear character insight, the audience is able to clearly see Chaucers clever irony, when the Merchant goes on to talk about marriage being a ful greet sacrament. The use of the word sacrament links to the Roman Catholic attitude towards marriage, as it is one of the seven sacraments. However, the Merchant has previously made clear his view that a wife is a husbands possession, his property. This quite clearly contradicts the idea of marriage being a sacrament, as there is no mention of love involved in the marriage. Chaucer is using irony and contradicting statements to highlight the inconsistencies in the Merchants sermon. It is through this that the audience is made aware of the insincere attitude in the encomium. This is further supported later in the poem, when Januarie talks of wishing to be wedded hastily. Again, there is no mention of love between the couple, it is presented more so as a business transaction, linking to the language of the Merchant. Within the encomium, the Merchant praises the notion of an old man marrying a young woman of tendre of age. It seems that Chaucer is displaying the almost lecherous attitude towards marriage held by some older men, as this is not a Medieval or Roman Catholic convention. Both a modern and Medieval audience would recognise the notion of an old man taking a young wife as unnatural. This goes against the Roman Catholic idea of marriage as a sacrament; it would have been seen as unnatural and wrong. The Merchant expresses the belief that this is acceptable and then goes on to use Biblical references in his encomium. Chaucer is using irony here, to undermine the Merchants argument, as he is contradicting his beliefs. He is going against Catholic normalities, but yet cites examples from the Bible. In the Merchants subsequent appeal to the Adam and Eve exemplum as a precedent for Januaries project, we have the first of numerous double-edged scriptural references that could very easily contradict the very argument at hand. This is seen again in the Merchants reference to female Biblical figures such as Rebekke and Abigail. The Merchant wishes to illustrate his belief that a wife is a great aid to a husband, calling forth the examples of these apparently good women. However, Medieval audiences would have understood that each of these women were in fact deceitful, sly and cunning. A modern reader may be unfamiliar with these Biblical figures, so irony used here by Chaucer may be unrecognised. Overall, Chaucer effectively reveals attitudes towards marriage through his use of style, language and irony within the encomium. Through presenting a rhetorical and highly insincere digression, Chaucer is able to convey to both a modern and Medieval audience different attitudes towards marriage.